Chris Responds to Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Vote

On Friday 20 June, I voted for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The Bill has prompted heartfelt and serious debate, both in Parliament and across the country. I know it is a subject that touches on deeply held personal beliefs, and I want to take a moment to explain why I reached the decision I did when it came before the House of Commons.

In recent weeks and months, we have seen Parliament at its best: informed, considered and passionate, with respect shown across the House for those on all sides of the debate. I have spent a great deal of time reflecting on the Assisted Dying Bill, reading thoughtful emails from constituents, reviewing detailed briefings from organisations both for and against, and hosting constituency roundtables to listen to personal stories and different perspectives. I have followed the Bill closely throughout its parliamentary journey and believe that it has evolved into a more balanced and carefully constructed piece of legislation than it was at the start.

My decision to support the bill was shaped by careful thought and compassion, taken with full awareness of the moral and ethical complexities involved. I understand that some will be disappointed, and I want to acknowledge the sincerity and strength of feeling among those who oppose it. I respect those views, just as I hope my own are respected in return.

In the United Kingdom today, individuals with mental capacity can legally refuse life-sustaining treatment, even if that decision leads to their death. Yet they cannot seek medical assistance to take an approved substance that would allow them to end their suffering on their own terms. For me, that is a contradiction that cannot be ignored. The current system can prolong suffering in ways that feel deeply unjust. This Bill seeks to change that by offering terminally ill people the ability to make a considered and safeguarded choice at the end of life.

I believe it is time to offer a compassionate, safe and clearly regulated choice for those nearing the end of their lives who want to take it. I know the House of Lords will give the Bill further scrutiny as it continues its legislative journey, and in Scotland the Scottish Parliament is currently considering its own legislation. Across the UK we have, as a nation, considered this deeply emotive and personal subject in a thorough and respectful fashion. I would like to thank everyone who contacted me on this issue. Your contributions and reflections have helped ensure this debate has been approached with the seriousness and respect it deserves.